In the end, some travel writers may lose out because they fail to adapt to changing spends and trends. Likewise, many bloggers will either switch to more lucrative employment, or may get paid to write for the corporates. Which is PR, not blogging.
Or is it PRogging?
The need for great writers of books, magazines, journals, blogs and advertisements will never go away. If you're good enough, you'll not be replaced and you will adapt.
I also wonder, will event organisers last if they fail to come up with less simplistic subject matter? Ha.
Posted by: Scribe | September 22, 2006 06:37 PM
Hello Scribe
What do you mean by the last question? I don't get it.
Fellow Scribe
I found this article about travel writers on the Australian Society of Writers bulletin board. Interesting.
Beyond the pale?
By freelance travel writer, Steenie Harvey in Ireland
Travel writers. We're corrupt... our work is tainted... readers shouldn't trust our recommendations.
That's what Miami Herald readers probably believe after seeing this headline in the business section: "When visiting South Beach, be sure to try the free sushi, nightclubs, cocktails and hotel rooms. But only if you're a travel writer."
The five writers who found themselves in the spotlight were Brits. And the journalist who penned the article could barely hide his outrage. He made my compatriots sound like the most loathsome bunch of freeloaders ever to roam the earth.
The article pointed out they'd gotten free round-trip airfare from London, complimentary rooms in South Beach and Fort Lauderdale, and six days of gratis meals. But that wasn't all...
Our writers lolled around in a "boudoir-themed hotspot." They sipped an "amuse-bouche of lobster bisque." They stuffed their faces with dulce de leche soufflés and molten chocolate cakes.
The thing is, press trips can be hard work... and that wasn't mentioned. After a 10-hour daily slog of non-stop sightseeing, what's wrong with a $750 night out where somebody else picks up the tab?
In my view, nothing. But according to the travel editors of some US newspapers, there's plenty wrong with it. Many won't use articles about destinations where a writer has accepted complimentary or subsidized travel. As a freelancer, it's something you need to be aware of.
The thinking is that by going on junkets, writers are compromised. ''If you're recommending a place because you've been led by the nose by a publicist to the place, to me that sounds fishy,'' said Chicago Tribune travel editor Randy Curwen.
It seems unfair. Sports writers get free tickets (and the best seats in the stadium). Music and book reviewers get free CDS and books. And contributors to motoring sections do not buy a brand-new Porsche before they test-drive it. Nobody calls their judgment into question.
Posted by: freospirit | September 24, 2006 12:51 PM
With notable exceptions, many of these shows set conflict as the agenda - in other words, setting up two opposing arguments and debating them.
While they can make good spectacles, starting with conflict can dictate the tone of discussions, and miss the opportunity. I suspect successful travel agents sitting through repeated "demise of the agent" sessions go away feeling likewise.
What I prefer is problem solving and how-to sessions. Bloggers and journalists co-exist, as do agents and online players. How can it work better? Elaborating on real-life success stories or giving problem-solving examples seems to a better use of people's "face time" than playing out simplified conflicts.
Posted by: Scribe | September 24, 2006 07:02 PM